The Start Line Problem

๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐——๐—ผ ๐—ช๐—ฒ ๐—š๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฃ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ?

When you start digging into the dynamics of success, itโ€™s not always just about whoโ€™s talented and works hard. Itโ€™s about who gets the opportunity to show that theyโ€™re talented, what I call: the start line problem.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—Ÿ๐—ฎ๐˜„ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—˜๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜€ (๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—ป๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—”๐—ฑ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ)

I recently listened to Howard Marks excellent podcast episode, โ€œShall We Repeal the Laws of Economics?โ€ Itโ€™s a breakdown of why free markets and capitalism work and I agree with every word. Marks emphasises that the incentives in a free market drive capital, labour, and risk-taking to their most efficient ends and raises the collective standard of living. Along the way, Marks mentions something profound:

โ€œSome people do considerably better than others thanks to good luck and/or inherited advantage, rather than innate ability.โ€ 

โ€œSome peopleโ€? How many people? What proportion of people?

If we define inherited advantage to include encouragement to raise ambitions, networks, mentorship and economic safety to take risks; is inherited advantage 1% of the battle to do well or 20%? What if itโ€™s 70%? It seems to me that knowing the answer to this question is very important.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฆ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€

In Shoe Dog, Phil Knight's journey to creating Nike is inspiring. When I read it, I noted two pivotal moments almost no one else that I have discussed it with could even recall. First, Knightโ€™s father gives him money to travel to Japan to explore the idea of selling shoes. Then, when Knight needs capital to buy his first inventory, his father steps in again with a loan. These are small parts of the story but they are foundational. Without his fatherโ€™s support, thereโ€™s no trip to Japan, no inventory, no sales, no Nike.

Shoe Dog is just an example, nearly every story of business success has such a moment. Theyโ€™re not cinematic and so arenโ€™t particularly memorable but once you start noticing them, you notice them everywhere.

๐—ช๐—ต๐˜† ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐˜๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€

Imagine a race where some runners start on flat ground while others have to scale walls just to get to the track. Itโ€™s not just unfairโ€”itโ€™s inefficient. Every time a talented person is held back due to a lack of opportunity, we all lose. We lose out on the businesses they would build, the jobs they would create, and the innovations they would unleash.

๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ก๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ

At State School Ventures weโ€™re building a path to the start line for those with talent, drive, and ambition, regardless of their background. The goal isnโ€™t to change capitalism; itโ€™s to enhance it. 

If we get this right, itโ€™s not just about fairness; itโ€™s about growth. The hidden cost of our current system isnโ€™t just inequalityโ€”itโ€™s the lost potential of the untapped talent out there. The future Phil Knights who otherwise wouldnโ€™t get a chance to run.

Previous
Previous

Incubating Innovation for Charities

Next
Next

YLD x SSV